They say Ayers is not a big deal...

I believe it is, and here is why. In 40 years if they became professors, but were still unrepentant of their crimes, self labeled communists, and were radical with their education ideals, I could never hang out with the likes of:
-Richard Reid the Shoe Bomber
-Ted Kaczynski the Unabomber
-Timothy McVeigh the Oklahoma City Bomber
-Osama bin Laden
-Ayman al-Zawahiri
-Ramzi Yousef
-Adam Pearlman (Azzam the American)
-Zacarias Massaoui
-The Fort Dix Six
-Jose Padilla

Or any other terrorist. If any of the listed repented what they have done, I still would not start my career in their living room, or serve on TWO boards with them. It does not make sense, Ayers is unrepentant, and has stated that they should have done more. I would not have to distance myself or defend myself against accusations of being close to a terrorist because I would never.

McCain needs help...

Someone please get him a defibrillator, he needs all the help he can get. During last night's debate, Sen. John McCain stopped short each time he had the chance to finish Obama off. Obama has yet to actually seal the deal himself, but McCain has had the chances to. There were so many untruths stated yesterday by Obama, and McCain never fired back on them. First off, the Secret Service has come out and stated that "Kill Him" was never yelled at any McCain or Palin rally. This seemed like a ploy by Obama to obtain some sympathy. There was also a moment in last night's debate when McCain stated that Obama told Joe the Plumber that he wanted to "spread the wealth." Obama was shaking his head when McCain brought up the fact that Obama wants to "spread the wealth around." It is what he told the Plumber, but now he was backing out of it as he has about everything else. (Go to minute 9:21 to see.) McCain could have hammered Obama on the fact that he sat on TWO boards with Ayers, and he could have furthered hammered the fact that his political career WAS started in Ayers' living room, which Obama lied boldly to the American people, this is after his campaign had already confirmed it. The ACORN ties were left loose, and Obama was able to refute those with lies. McCain could have brought up Jeremiah Wright, which he refuses to do, and I honestly am dumbfounded by why he would not. Obama's abortion record is clear, he is for Freedom of Choice. Freedom of Choice takes away ALL restrictions on abortions. Obama lied again about his votes while in the Illinois Senate, but McCain failed to deliver. Obama is for tax payer funded abortions, again McCain failed to deliver. This was the only opportunity that McCain had left to tell the American People, the media is not reporting this, but he failed. McCain should have also focused on Obama's inexperience.

I am unsure as to who is going to win, and quite honestly I do not think either of them are suited for the job. But one of them is going to be elected, and Obama has an extensive record, a repeated pattern, of bad judgement. It is either bad judgement that he has had in the past, because he continues to change his position and his past, or it is who he truly is. If he gets elected we will see a tremendous change in America, but it will not be the change Obama is promising. Obama won the Democratic nomination through his far left policies and ideology, but now he has been shifting to a more Populist ideology to obtain more votes. If he gets elected, I can guarantee that he will not keep the popular platform he has run on.

Obama and Ayers, "he thought he was rehabilitated...

Barack Obama was interviewed and stated that "The gentleman in question, Bill Ayers, is a college professor, teaches education at the University of Illinois," he said. "That's how i met him -- working on a school reform project that was funded by an ambassador and very close friend of Ronald Reagan's" along with "a bunch of conservative businessmen and civic leaders."
"Ultimately, I ended up learning about the fact that he had engaged in this reprehensible act 40 years ago, but I was eight years old at the time and I assumed that he had been rehabilitated," Obama said. As Ben Smith from the Politico has reported.

What is funny to me is that even after in 2001, Bill Ayers stated that they "should have done more," as Bernadine Dohrn has stated as well, he never really spoke out against them until after he was campaigning for President. What I find interesting is that Leonore Annenberg, the wife of Walter Annenberg of the Annenberg Foundations, has endorsed John McCain. Why can't Obama be a man and admit that he was wrong and showed bad judgement when choosing to associate with Ayers? Why? Because he does not see a problem with it, I mean in his book "Dreams From my Father" on page 100, he does say "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors and structural feminists."

So who were these Marxist Professors? Professors like William Ayers? It is clear that he knew, and would have sought the approval of professors like Ayers. Remember, he did not want to be seen as a sellout.

Ayers and the World Education Forum...

Ayers, as late as November of 2006, visited Venezuela to attend the World Education Forum, invited by Hugo Chavez and Vice President Luis Rangel. Bill Ayers blogged about the event on his page, which I have linked Comrades!

Here are little snipets of his speech if you don't want to read it:

"President Hugo Chavez, Vice-President Vicente Rangel, Ministers Moncada and Isturiz, invited guests,comrades. I’m honored and humbled to be here with you this morning. I bring greetings and support from your brothers and sisters throughout Northamerica. Welcome to the World Education Forum! Amamos la revolucion Bolivariana!"

I guess, comrades, I really don't have to paste anymore. Did Obama not know about this either?

Associations

The liberals have not come out of left field with their response to the William Ayers association. They are responding with Todd Palin's association with the Alaskan Independence Party. Todd Palin was a a member of that party, and according to the Party's website "Todd Palin was registered as a member but never participated in any party activities aside from attending a convention in Wasilla at one time." And I have read up on the Party and will admit that I do not approve of some of their ideology, mostly the idea of Alaska seceding from the United States. Their leader, Joe Vogler, was dead by the time Todd Palin joined, therefore no association could be made.

I guess this could be compared to Michelle Obama stating that for the first time in her adult life she was proud of this country. It only took her husband running for President for that to occur. Another comparison that could be made is to that of Jeremiah Wright who has consistently voiced his dislike of the United States, and White people. The difference is that Todd Palin was not an active member, and was only a member for a few years. Obama sat in those pews for over 20 years and had no problem with what was being said. And not until the Jeremiah Wright controversy popped up did he renounce the church. Also, Obama wrote in his books about how Jeremiah Wright was a mentor, and even titled one of his books after a sermon by him. So let's say that we can, even though they are not, evens. How can that be compared to Ayers?

How can one compare an affiliation to a party that wants to secede from the U.S. for God knows what reason, be compared to a terrorist who wanted to kill Americans and stated that "they did not do enough." It is appalling to think that anyone can make this comparison in their head, and it make sense. A murdered who killed police officers and wanted to bomb Government buildings, how is this comparable?

In times of desperation, and for fear of the truth, the mind can be tricked into believing even the most extraordinary of fallacies.

Update: Seriously? David Axelrod, who runs the Obama campaign said that at the time when William Ayers was helping launch Obama's career, and serving on boards with him, he did not know the history about William Ayers. Seriously? And even if he did not have an idea, wouldn't you denounce him once you became aware?

Obama and the Chicago Annenburg Challenge

CNN tried to state that Palin's comments were untrue. Well Obama served on the board of the Chicago Annenburg Challenge with Ayers. The basis for CNN calling the claim false is that Ayers is no longer involved in any terrorist activities, although in 2001 he stated that they should have done more. And any person who was once a terrorist is always a terrorist. If Osama Bin Laden stops his involvement in terrorist activities, then in 40 years states that he should have done more, should we not consider him a terrorist any longer? I would. He held a fundraiser for Obama when he was running for Senate. And they also served on a second board together. So how could they determine this to be a false claim? I do not understand.

Palin's Obama Comments

Sarah Palin came out strong, stating what we have all been wanting to hear, Obama's ties to radicals, and his dislike of America. The video can be seen here . But now, the liberal media has said that "Palin's words carry racial tinge." How? Sarah Palin is stating the truth, yet the media is playing the race card. I believe that most Americans have no issue with electing a black President, but I do believe that many Americans have a big problem with electing Obama. Why? A few names come to mind, names like Saul Alinsky, William Ayers, and Jeremiah Wright. The media is so in the tank that any mention of these individuals and they will result in playing the race card. It is a politics of fear. The liberals plan on making every American who does not support Obama, feel like a racist. It is appalling that they have to resort to this behavior.

Obama and the media have done a very good job at trying to sweep his past under the rug, and have even tried to censor those who have tried to speak about this. It is incredible to me how there are some that do not realize that Obama is a socialist, and how we can become the United Socialist-States of America. Obama was voted most liberal Senator, even while Bernie Sanders, a self described Socialist, served alongside him. Obama actually helped Bernie Sanders campaign for the Senate, and Sanders is not even a part of the Democratic Party, he is an independent Socialist from the state of Vermont.

Does the Obama campaign think Americans are stupid? I think that it is obvious. And I believe people will realize, if they have not already, that he is not the right direction for this country to go in.